So far so excellent: there can be no doubt it is preferable to enjoy what is best about the in-store shopping experience, while offering the benefits of a massive (and almost magically always-available) inventory to all: that's seemingly a huge improvement to anything bricks-and-mortar can offer.
So, where's the rub? I was struck very heavily with a problem when I was discussing the concept with an entrepreneur, busily engaged in developing this very concept. He told me, enthusiastically, that when his new tech is developed, the consumer would be able to 'treat her own bedroom as changing room, with her own device as a mirror'. In the context of the plus-size female consumer, I felt instinctive horror at this thought. In my long experience of styling larger women, I discovered that the very last thing they require is to be left alone and isolated.
Plus-size women, famously (or rather, infamously), suffer from horrendous fit problems. Their diverse body shapes do not slip easily into any range of standard sizes, and many women have no real idea what size they are for the excellent reason that they do not conform to any standard size at all. Many plus brands have differing grading, created to offer more diversity of fit. This, although a necessary step, has only added to the general confusion around plus-sizing.
On the face of it, all of this would appear to add weight to the need for the kind of sizing tech now being created: the consumer will click on her chosen piece of apparel, and the avatar will graphically show her whether it will fit or not helping her to choose a good match for her body if one were available; warning her off if nothing suitable can be found. This should at least prevent the customer adding to the mountain of returned stock that is afflicting the industry the very expensive problem that is driving the development of e-commerce fit technology in the first place.
However, this system is likely to create a train of unintended consequences, which can all be traced back to those pesky fit issues.
Let's say a plus-size woman is shopping on a website that sells a brand that is not graded to fit her body shape: whilst browsing, she is likely to experience an irritating Groundhog Day. She clicks on a blouse: "Computer says no" is the result. She clicks her next choice, a pair of trousers "It says no". Finally, she looks at a dress: "No".
And this problem is not just going to afflict the 'one brand' website. It will also affect the multi-brand retailer. The customer (even when she has the opportunity of picking from a spread of brands) will as likely as not will still be reliving a repetitive experience. Why? Because the reason why she chose the first item is the same one that's behind her subsequent choices: her taste. She is unlikely to use a scattergun approach, choosing one item from each brand. Rather, she will be attracted to the aesthetics of one design story, and the lion's share of her choices will come from that. If she is lucky enough that this is a brand that suits her body shape (and, with the diversity of these shapes, statistically speaking, this is unlikely), then she'll be fine. Otherwise, it's going to be a miserable experience.
This is a system that relies, firstly, on the retailer stocking a range of differing grading carefully selected to suit the six main body shapes. And secondly, it needs the customer to happen to want to shop the brands that suit her. You might say that what we are expecting to happen is what occurs every day with the very best plus-size retailers (who succeed in providing the correct spread of stock), but with one fatal exception: at home, the customer has no guide. There is no helpful stylist by her side: she is expected to do this all alone.
Let's say that the pieces of clothing she clicked on will physically go on her (which is often impossible), but simply will not suit her body shape: they will cling in all the wrong places, and flap loose in other areas: all in all, it would all look horrible. The avatar is there to show her the truth: the 'realistic' look of the apparel. Will the avatar sugar-coat the pill, and make the clothing look acceptable? It should not, because that would risk encouraging her to buy something that is not going to be suitable. Will it give her a 'warts and all' image? If it does, it's likely that the repeated experience of ugly clothing (again and again and again) is going to make her feel depressed. When clothing does not fit plus-size women, it shows up their bodies in a poor light: she is likely to feel depressed, not just about the clothes, but about herself.
It is extreme cruelty to leave a plus-size woman all alone while she is trying to find something that fits her: I would hope that this fact alone is enough to give developers pause. If it does not, then it may be worth mentioning that this glitch may well lead to the overall failure of their fit tool.
Sizing tech and curated content go hand-in-hand with the plus-size womenswear customer. Each time a woman is told that something she has selected is not going to fit her, she needs to be shown something that will. It's not a problem that should be underestimated depending on her size, it's likely that most clothing will not fit her adequately.
A consumer will need to be triaged at the earliest point of the interaction, and a story that will fit her should be collated. A lot of effort should be given over to being able to gather a selection of apparel that suits her body shape, and every clue that she gives off should be used to discover stock that makes sense to her aesthetically, and is practical, relevant and useful to her. Many larger retailers will be in a position to provide what is required to fit all these needs, but for smaller retailers, it would be better for them to buddy-up and pass on their consumers to partner companies with whom they share a platform.
The real issue is not whether it's feasible to recreate a realistic facsimile of an authentic in-store experience using cutting-edge tech. Unfortunately, it's all too possible to accurately synthesise the miserable encounters that legions of plus-size women have had in mediocre, failing stores over many decades.
The true issue at hand is how to provide a system based on excellence. This should be what we focus on, and what we wish for.